VERSAR INC VSR (last ticker on record)
CIK 803647Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Dentons US LLP | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 102 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 1.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wayne ShortridgeCarlton FieldsFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 4.02× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- Elizabeth NoePaul HastingsFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne ShortridgeCarlton Fields | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.61 | 4.02 | 3.45 |
| Elizabeth NoePaul Hastings | Aug 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.36 | 2.59 | 1.46 |