JOY GLOBAL INC JOY (last ticker on record)
CIK 801898Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jan 1998 to Dec 1999
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Robert S. Osborne, P.C.First linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 5.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 65 | 1.51 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Robert S. Osborne, P.C. | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 5.29 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. JenningsNelson MullinsFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith S. CrowKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. JenningsNelson Mullins | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Keith S. CrowKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |