HEMACARE CORP HEMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 801748Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- SANDERS, BARNET, GOLDMAN, SIMONS & MOSKFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| SANDERS, BARNET, GOLDMAN, SIMONS & MOSK | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Peter M. MenardSheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charles S. KaufmanSheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| Peter M. MenardSheppard Mullin | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charles S. KaufmanSheppard Mullin | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.85 |