CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES CORP CAMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 800460Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David P. LewisDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Stephen M. WurzburgPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Richard A. BoehmerO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Peter M. AstizDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David P. LewisDLA Piper | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Stephen M. WurzburgPillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Richard A. BoehmerO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Peter M. AstizDLA Piper | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 1.41 |