ODP Corp ODP (last ticker on record)
CIK 800240Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2006 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 17
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 17
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- SCOTT N. GIERKEFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Dechert LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Fried Frank | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Holland & Knight | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| SCOTT N. GIERKE | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- David M. EatonKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Eric M. SwedenburgSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Phyllis G. KorffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- SCOTT N. GIERKEMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- William J. Quinlan Jr.McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.99×
- John W. CarrShapiro Buchman ProvineFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Michael P. BrueckKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- John E. SorkinJacobson LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |
| David M. EatonKilpatrick Townsend | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.61 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Eric M. SwedenburgSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 1.22 |
| Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & Hartson | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| Phyllis G. KorffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.53 | 0.58 | 1.18 |
| SCOTT N. GIERKEMcDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| William J. Quinlan Jr.McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.99 |
| John W. CarrShapiro Buchman Provine | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Michael P. BrueckKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 14 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 23 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| John E. SorkinJacobson LLP | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 5 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 4.13 |