New Gold Inc. /FI
CIK 800166Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Bull Housser & TupperFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Bull Housser & Tupper | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.64 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason J. CoxFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Holger KrutzelmannFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher L. DoerksenDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason J. Cox | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.74 |
| Holger Krutzelmann | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher L. DoerksenDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.81 |