CARMIKE CINEMAS INC CKEC (last ticker on record)
CIK 799088Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1998 to Nov 2000
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Husch Blackwell | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| King & Spalding | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Jones Day | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Fried Frank | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- C. William BaxleyKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Alan J. PrinceKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- James L. Smith IIITroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. William BaxleyKing & Spalding | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Alan J. PrinceKing & Spalding | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| James L. Smith IIITroutman Sanders LLP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |