CHINA SKY ONE MEDICAL, INC. CSKI (last ticker on record)
CIK 798985Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2009 to Dec 2012
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Hodgson Russ | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric C. MendelsonBlank RomeFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.37× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Jeffrey A. RindeBondy & Schloss LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric C. MendelsonBlank Rome | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 4.37 | 2.89 | 2.58 |
| Jeffrey A. RindeBondy & Schloss LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.86 | 1.96 | 0.48 |