UNIT CORP UNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 798949Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2008 to Jul 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2020 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2020 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Conner & Winters | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. TelleVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2020 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Jason B. CoutantConner & WintersFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Robert J. MelgaardConner & WintersFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. TelleVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2020 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Jason B. CoutantConner & Winters | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Robert J. MelgaardConner & Winters | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 1.18 |