PPG INDUSTRIES INC PPG (last ticker on record)
CIK 79879Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Linklaters LLP | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| K&L Gates | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey W. AcreK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mark L. HansonJones DayFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Kristen L. StewartK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael C. McLeanK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Ann Bailen FisherSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey W. AcreK&L Gates | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Mark L. HansonJones Day | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Steven A. RosenblumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Kristen L. StewartK&L Gates | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael C. McLeanK&L Gates | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Ann Bailen FisherSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.04 |