NATIONAL LAMPOON INC NLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 798078Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kelly Lytton & Vann LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.90× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 5.87×
- Leagre Chandler & Millard LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Kelly Lytton & Vann LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.19 | 1.56 | 0.00 |
| KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.90 | 1.33 | 5.87 |
| Leagre Chandler & Millard LLP | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 10 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James Martin KaplanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Richard DiStefanoBlank RomeFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Martin KaplanTroutman Sanders LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.04 | 1.78 | 1.88 |
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Richard DiStefanoBlank Rome | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 3.34 |