ASSET BACKED SECURITIES CORP
CIK 797510Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- McKee Nelson LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| McKee Nelson LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 53 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.20 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Brown & Wood | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Sidley Austin | Dec 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen S. Kudenholdt[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Reed D. AuerbachMcKee Nelson LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen S. Kudenholdt[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Reed D. AuerbachMcKee Nelson LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.15 |