METAL MANAGEMENT INC MM (last ticker on record)
CIK 795665Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- SHEFSKY & FROELICHFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Mayer Brown | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| SHEFSKY & FROELICH | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.74 | 2.29 | 0.68 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- E. William Bates IIKing & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- David A. CarpenterMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- PAUL W. THEISSMayer BrownFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert T. ClarksonWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. William Bates IIKing & Spalding | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| David A. CarpenterMayer Brown | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| PAUL W. THEISSMayer Brown | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert T. ClarksonWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.76 |