WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC WTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 795403Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 1995 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Stephen W. RanereLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 3.46× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Robert P. Whalen Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- David F. DietzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Stephen W. RanereLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORR | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.47 | 3.46 | 1.55 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Robert P. Whalen Jr.Goodwin Procter | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| David F. DietzGoodwin Procter | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |