MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE INC VIVO (last ticker on record)
CIK 794172Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Dec 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- TIMOTHY E. HOBERGTaft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick G. QuickFoley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul V. MuethingKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| TIMOTHY E. HOBERGTaft Stettinius & Hollister | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick G. QuickFoley & Lardner | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Paul V. MuethingKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |