RESEARCH FRONTIERS INC REFR (last ticker on record)
CIK 793524Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 2007 to Jul 2026
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Kronish Lieb Weiner & HellmanFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Duane Morris | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.00 | 1.47 | 1.85 |
| Baker & Daniels | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Robert J. HasdayDuane MorrisFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Robert J. HasdayDuane Morris | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 1.46 |
| Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker Daniels | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 13 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.43 |