HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC HMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 792985Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 26
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Balch & BinghamFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- CARRINGTON COLEMAN SLOMAN & BLUMENTHALFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Parker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Adams and ReeseFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Bingham Greenebaum DollFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Bradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Hancock Daniel Johnson & NagleFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kutak RockFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Liechty & McGinnisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.27×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- MONTGOMERY & ANDREWSFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.93×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Balch & Bingham | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| CARRINGTON COLEMAN SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 45 | 1.03 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| Adams and Reese | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 37 | 1.78 | 0.43 | 1.55 |
| Ballard Spahr | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Bingham Greenebaum Doll | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Bradley Arant Boult Cummings | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 58 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.47 |
| Hancock Daniel Johnson & Nagle | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 12 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Hodgson Russ | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Husch Blackwell | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| King & Spalding | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Kutak Rock | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Liechty & McGinnis | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 3.27 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 63 | 1.24 | 0.44 | 1.29 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| MONTGOMERY & ANDREWS | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.93 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Patrick J. DooleyAkin GumpFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel R. KinelHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Craig S. WittlinHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.21×
- Emmett W. BerrymanLiechty & McGinnisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
- Suzanne C. OdomMONTGOMERY & ANDREWSFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Patrick J. DooleyAkin Gump | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel R. KinelHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Craig S. WittlinHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.21 |
| Emmett W. BerrymanLiechty & McGinnis | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 3.54 |
| Suzanne C. OdomMONTGOMERY & ANDREWS | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.19 |