IMPCO TECHNOLOGIES INC IMCO (last ticker on record)
CIK 790708Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Jan 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Jan 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Perkins Coie | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles C. KimMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- P. RUPERT RUSSELLShartsis Friese LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.84×
- Craig S. MordockMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles C. KimMorrison & Foerster | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| P. RUPERT RUSSELLShartsis Friese LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.84 |
| Craig S. MordockMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 2.32 |