IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS INC IMDS (last ticker on record)
CIK 790652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jorden Burt LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Adorno & Yoss, P.A.First linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Krieger & PragerFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorden Burt LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Carlton Fields | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Adorno & Yoss, P.A. | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Krieger & Prager | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 38 | 0.90 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert B. MacaulayCarlton FieldsFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.55×
- CHRISTOPHER S. PETITO UIREJorden Burt LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert B. MacaulayCarlton Fields | Sep 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 2.55 |
| CHRISTOPHER S. PETITO UIREJorden Burt LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |