CONECTISYS CORP CONC (last ticker on record)
CIK 790273Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 1996 to Dec 2014
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutan & Tucker | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Grushko & Mittman | May 2001 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. BradleyRutan & TuckerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Larry A. CeruttiRutan & TuckerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Noel E. GuardiFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Gerald J. GuarciniBallard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & MittmanFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. BradleyRutan & Tucker | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Larry A. CeruttiRutan & Tucker | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.43 | 0.77 | 1.78 |
| Noel E. Guardi | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Gerald J. GuarciniBallard Spahr | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 69 | 1.48 | 1.67 | 0.40 |
| Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & Mittman | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 33 | 1.17 | 2.89 | 1.54 |