VMS NATIONAL PROPERTIES JOINT VENTURE
CIK 789089Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Powell Goldstein | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph A. CocoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gregory M. ChaitPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Katherine M. KoopsPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Jonathan L. FriedmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph A. CocoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.95 | 0.46 | 1.24 |
| Gregory M. ChaitPowell Goldstein | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Katherine M. KoopsPowell Goldstein | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 1.34 |
| Jonathan L. FriedmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.58 |