PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC PEG (last ticker on record)
CIK 788784Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.78 |