MILLER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. MILL (last ticker on record)

CIK 785968Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

95% wipeout
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Bankruptcy
Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 4; Newest began Aug 2017
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Dec 2013 to Dec 2015
Law firms: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Aug 15, 2017An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Mar 29, 2016Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 29, 2016Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 6, 2015Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 6, 2015An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Aug 5, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 16, 2015Shares down 95% from their high
Apr 29, 2015A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 26, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 5, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 1, 2011Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 30, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 18, 2011Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 22, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Mar 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	783	1.09	0.11	1.03
Pearlman Schneider LLP	Jul 2012	Named in a filing	32	1.34	1.79	1.41
Roxanne K. Beilly	Mar 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	44	1.21	2.14	1.45
Schneider Weinberger LLP	Mar 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	77	1.59	2.20	1.44
Steven I. Weinberger	Mar 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	49	1.10	1.85	1.51
Snow Becker Krauss P.C.	Feb 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	37	1.50	1.67	1.42
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP	Dec 2013	Text search only	390	1.38	0.86	1.22
Andrews Kurth LLP	Aug 2011	Text search only	398	1.27	0.35	1.30

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Apr 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	26	1.26	0.00	1.61
Jim PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Apr 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	9	2.18	0.00	2.14
T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Mar 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	55	1.64	0.20	1.96
James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLP	Mar 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	69	1.69	2.51	1.47
David R. FishkinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.	Feb 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	6	1.59	0.00	2.60
Jack BeckerSnow Becker Krauss P.C.	Feb 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	11	2.35	0.90	2.08
Kai Haakon E. LiekefettSidley Austin	Mar 2014	Text search only	29	2.23	0.00	0.90
Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLP	Mar 2009	Text search only	47	1.33	1.75	1.32
Leonard W. BurninghamBrunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC	Jan 2001	Text search only	36	1.41	1.54	1.62