PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO INC PNY (last ticker on record)
CIK 78460Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Parker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDONFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.03 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Nelson Mullins | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 3.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert T. Lucas IIIFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- R. Douglas HarmonParker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel L. Johnson Jr.Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert T. Lucas III | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| R. Douglas HarmonParker Poe Adams & Bernstein | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel L. Johnson Jr.Moore & Van Allen | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |