GLEACHER & COMPANY, INC. GLCH (last ticker on record)

CIK 782842Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Mar 2013
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jun 27, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 6, 2013Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 11, 2013Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 18, 2013A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 21, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 22, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 22, 2011Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 17, 2007Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 27, 2007Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 27, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 15, 2007A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Covington & Burling	Apr 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	447	1.07	0.27	0.99
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP	Apr 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	390	1.38	0.86	1.22
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2011	Named in a filing	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Sidley Austin	Feb 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	1,210	1.30	0.14	0.93
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP	Oct 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	126	1.60	0.00	0.15
Dewey Ballantine	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	228	2.03	0.29	0.87
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Jun 2003	Named in a filing	741	1.31	0.12	0.76
Pillsbury Winthrop	May 2002	Named in a filing	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Goodwin Procter	May 2001	Named in a filing	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy	May 1999	Named in a filing	439	1.03	0.35	0.76
Potter Anderson & Corroon	Apr 2014	Text search only	127	1.41	0.45	0.87
Latham & Watkins LLP	May 2013	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Cassels Brock & Blackwell	Jul 2009	Text search only	102	0.99	0.79	0.77
Foley Hoag	Jul 2009	Text search only	186	0.72	0.95	1.17
Harris Beach	Jul 2009	Text search only	38	1.03	0.00	1.24

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Michael R. NeidellOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP	Apr 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	14	0.74	0.00	0.57
Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2011	Named in a filing	62	1.60	0.00	0.85
Gabriel SaltarelliSidley Austin	May 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	7	3.61	0.00	0.00
Donald J. MurrayCovington & Burling	Apr 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	27	1.20	0.59	1.19
Christopher P. PetersonArnold & Porter	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	10	2.29	0.00	1.69
Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Jun 2003	Named in a filing	55	2.10	0.00	0.92
Herbert J. Huff	Feb 1994	Named in SEC correspondence	38	2.00	0.00	0.50
John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLP	May 2013	Text search only	28	0.56	0.00	0.39