AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES REIT INC
CIK 778437Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- LABOON, L.L.P.First linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, L.L.P.First linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Harris BeachFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| LABOON, L.L.P. | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, L.L.P. | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.20 | 1.15 | 0.46 |
| Harris Beach | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 38 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| King & Spalding | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Thompson & Knight | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. WeibleBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bryan L. GoolsbyLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. WeibleBaker & Hostetler | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Bryan L. GoolsbyLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.72 |