PHH CORP PHH (last ticker on record)
CIK 77776Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2009 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Bryan Cave | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2009 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Piper Rudnick | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Andrew RodmanBryan CaveFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Penny J. MinnaDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- David ChalkDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Andrew RodmanBryan Cave | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Penny J. MinnaDLA Piper | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| David ChalkDLA Piper | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |