RES CARE INC RSCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 776325Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 18
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Frost Brown ToddFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Brown Todd & HeyburnFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Miller & MartinFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- MONTGOMERY & ANDREWSFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.93×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaye Scholer | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Frost Brown Todd | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Brown Todd & Heyburn | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.52 | 1.07 | 0.57 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Fried Frank | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| K&L Gates | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Winston & Strawn | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Miller & Martin | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 49 | 0.33 | 1.26 | 0.74 |
| MONTGOMERY & ANDREWS | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.93 |
| Powell Goldstein | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joel I. GreenbergKaye ScholerFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Alan K. MacDonaldFrost Brown ToddFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel I. GreenbergKaye Scholer | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Alan K. MacDonaldFrost Brown Todd | Oct 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.79 |