UNITED BANCORP INC UBMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 775345Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Krieg DeVaultFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bodman LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krieg DeVault | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Bodman LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 26 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charlie GoodeWarner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gordon R. LewisWarner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Fred B. GreenBodman LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie GoodeWarner Norcross & Judd | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 16 | 3.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Gordon R. LewisWarner Norcross & Judd | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Fred B. GreenBodman LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 2.15 |