PEPSICO INC PEP (last ticker on record)

CIK 77476Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 1; Newest began Feb 2019
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 17; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Feb 15, 2019Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 8, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 6, 2016Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 13, 2014Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 9, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 14, 2008Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 20, 2006Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 30, 2004Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
WongPartnership LLP	Feb 2024	Named in a filing	17	0.62	0.00	2.10
Womble Bond Dickinson (US)	Nov 2018	Named in a filing	52	1.00	0.00	0.99
Proskauer Rose	Dec 2002	Named in a filing	492	1.15	0.48	1.08
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP	Dec 2002	Named in a filing	110	1.07	0.53	1.03
Davis Polk	Jan 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Cahill Gordon & Reindel	Jan 1995	Named in SEC correspondence	598	1.03	0.18	0.77
Bond Dickinson	Nov 2018	Text search only	11	0.00	0.00	1.90
Shearman & Sterling	Nov 2018	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Morris James	Dec 2009	Text search only	95	1.62	0.42	0.86
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell	Dec 2009	Text search only	256	1.51	0.21	0.89
Potter Anderson & Corroon	Dec 2009	Text search only	127	1.41	0.45	0.87
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Oct 2009	Text search only	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Dec 2002	Text search only	741	1.31	0.12	0.76
McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP	Dec 2002	Text search only	41	0.51	0.00	0.82
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy	Dec 2002	Text search only	439	1.03	0.35	0.76
King & Spalding	Jan 2001	Text search only	426	1.28	0.35	1.04
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Jan 2001	Text search only	889	1.31	0.07	0.59

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jean M. McLoughlinDavis Polk	Feb 2010	Named in a filing	24	1.27	0.00	0.41
George R. Bason Jr.Davis Polk	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	37	1.28	0.00	0.58
Marc O. WilliamsDavis Polk	Oct 2009	Named in a filing	26	1.70	0.00	0.38
Joseph A. HallDavis Polk	Oct 2008	Named in a filing	49	1.14	0.00	0.82
Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING	Feb 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	33	0.94	0.00	2.44
Allan R. WilliamsProskauer Rose	Dec 2002	Named in a filing	11	0.00	4.68	0.96
William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel	Jan 1995	Named in SEC correspondence	40	0.16	0.00	1.15
John H. ButlerSidley Austin	Oct 2009	Text search only	20	0.39	0.00	0.80
Craig B. BrodCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Dec 2002	Text search only	41	2.03	0.00	0.55
Henry O. Smith IIIProskauer Rose	Dec 2002	Text search only	13	1.06	3.48	3.01