PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK PBY (last ticker on record)
CIK 77449Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Willkie Farr | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.70×
- Daniel D. RubinoWillkie FarrFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter G. SmithKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan Lewis | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 2.70 |
| Daniel D. RubinoWillkie Farr | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter G. SmithKramer Levin Naftalis | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 23 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.25 |