WACHOVIA CORP/ NC
CIK 774203Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Brown & Wood | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| Powell Goldstein | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.79 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark J. MentingSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kathryn L. KnudsonPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Jeffrey M. SteinKing & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 4.14× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark J. MentingSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kathryn L. KnudsonPowell Goldstein | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.51 | 0.26 | 0.52 |
| Jeffrey M. SteinKing & Spalding | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.59 | 4.14 | 1.83 |