HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC HTCH (last ticker on record)
CIK 772897Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hahn & HessenFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nixon Peabody | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Faegre & Benson | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Hahn & Hessen | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Baker & Daniels | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dawn Holicky PruittFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Sonia A. ShewchukFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wendy B. MahlingFaegre & BensonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- KRIS SHARPEFaegre & BensonFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dawn Holicky PruittFaegre Baker Daniels | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Sonia A. ShewchukFaegre Baker Daniels | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Wendy B. MahlingFaegre & Benson | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| KRIS SHARPEFaegre & Benson | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.41 |