PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC CO PE (last ticker on record)
CIK 77227Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLPFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.88 | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wendy E. StarkFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary D. BenzFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lucas F. TorresAkin GumpFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy E. Stark | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary D. Benz | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lucas F. TorresAkin Gump | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |