CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY, INC. CSBR (last ticker on record)
CIK 771856Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Duane MorrisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin & Gibber, P.A.First linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duane Morris | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin & Gibber, P.A. | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Richard A. SilfenDuane MorrisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 0.16×
- Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2024 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.71 | 1.47 | 1.24 |
| Richard A. SilfenDuane Morris | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.45 | 0.93 | 0.16 |
| Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.34 | 0.37 | 1.69 |