ABM INDUSTRIES INC ABM (last ticker on record)
CIK 771497Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amy I. PanditMorgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Leslie P. JayOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John E. AguirreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- THERESE MROZEKBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy I. PanditMorgan Lewis | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 48 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Leslie P. JayOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John E. AguirreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| THERESE MROZEKBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.85 |