DIGITAL ANGEL CORP DOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 771252Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.First linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.24 | 1.47 | 1.37 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Blank Rome | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Nixon Peabody | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip T. ColtonWinthrop & Weinstine, P.A.First linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Michele D. VaillancourtWinthrop & Weinstine, P.A.First linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 3.04× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Francis J. Feeney Jr.DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Martin Eric WeisbergJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip T. ColtonWinthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 1.58 |
| Michele D. VaillancourtWinthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.48 | 3.04 | 1.28 |
| Francis J. Feeney Jr.DLA Piper | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 2.36 | 1.05 | 1.41 |
| Martin Eric WeisbergJenkens & Gilchrist | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 13 | 1.44 | 2.08 | 1.56 |