TRUMPS CASTLE FUNDING INC
CIK 770618Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Dykema Gossett | May 2003 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel D. RubinoWillkie FarrFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel D. RubinoWillkie Farr | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2003 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |