FENDER MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS CORP
CIK 767959Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek New York B.V.First linked May 2012 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gallagher & KennedyFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek New York B.V. | May 2012 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gallagher & Kennedy | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 32 | 0.44 | 0.98 | 1.05 |
| Bryan Cave | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Fennemore Craig | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- John L. SavvaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| John L. SavvaSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.12 |