CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP
CIK 764764Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2017 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2017 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason A. FriedhoffSidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James O ConnorSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Leslie P. JayOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason A. FriedhoffSidley Austin | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James O ConnorSidley Austin | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.84 | 2.34 | 1.05 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Leslie P. JayOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |