INTEGRA BANK CORP IBNK (last ticker on record)
CIK 764241Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 1997 to Nov 2011
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Frost Brown ToddFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Werner & BlankFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 104 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Frost Brown Todd | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jun 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Werner & Blank | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John E. FreechackBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- David C. WorrellBaker & DanielsFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & DanielsFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John E. FreechackBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| David C. WorrellBaker & Daniels | Jun 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.28 | 1.45 | 1.50 |
| JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & Daniels | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 15 | 1.55 | 1.33 | 1.47 |