POPULAR, INC. BPOP (last ticker on record)
CIK 763901Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Pietrantoni Mendez & AlvarezFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez | Dec 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Vedder Price | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. RicchiutoSidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Samir A. GandhiSidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Edward F. PetroskySidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- JENNIFER R. EVANSVedder PriceFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Donald J. ToumeySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. RicchiutoSidley Austin | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Samir A. GandhiSidley Austin | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| Edward F. PetroskySidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.44 |
| JENNIFER R. EVANSVedder Price | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Donald J. ToumeySullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |