CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC. CDR (last ticker on record)
CIK 761648Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ledgewood, PCFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Ledgewood, PC | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 42 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Brown & Wood | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. Brown Jr.Alston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. Brown Jr.Alston & Bird | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |