FISCHER IMAGING CORP FIMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 750901Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2005 to Aug 2006
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michelle ShepstonDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 4.22× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul HiltonHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle ShepstonDavis Graham & Stubbs | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.69 | 4.22 | 1.24 |
| Paul HiltonHogan Lovells US LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.17 | 1.02 | 1.42 |