PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORP PLLL (last ticker on record)
CIK 750561Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Lynch Chappell & AlsupFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Lynch Chappell & Alsup | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.21 |
| Akin Gump | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Scott WallaceHaynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Mark ZvonkovicAkin GumpFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- John C. ThompsonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Scott WallaceHaynes and Boone | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.08 | 1.45 | 0.80 |
| Mark ZvonkovicAkin Gump | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 16 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| John C. Thompson | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 13 | 1.09 | 1.92 | 2.05 |