Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. GCEH (last ticker on record)
CIK 748790Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2021 to Jun 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| King & Spalding | Jan 2024 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| TroyGould PC | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Stoel Rives | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heath C. TrisdaleKing & Spalding | Jan 2024 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.19 |