COGNOS INC COGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 746782Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett Jones | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| Torys LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Kevin M. BarryTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Kevin M. BarryTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |