ST JOE Co JOE (last ticker on record)
CIK 745308Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kirton McConkieFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Gunster Yoakley & StewartFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Kirton McConkie | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.54 | 1.07 | 1.30 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Foley & Lardner | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Gunster Yoakley & Stewart | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 45 | 1.42 | 0.39 | 0.36 |
| Davis Polk | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zachary J. DavisKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Andrew G. DietderichSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Paul T. SchultzFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MARC D. BASSEWITZLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zachary J. DavisKing & Spalding | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Andrew G. DietderichSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.55 | 2.41 | 0.81 |
| Paul T. Schultz | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & Cromwell | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MARC D. BASSEWITZLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |