INTERMET CORP IMTO (last ticker on record)
CIK 745287Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1999 to Oct 2005
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- KILPATRICK & CODYFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Dickinson Wright | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| KILPATRICK & CODY | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JEROME M. SCHWARTZDickinson WrightFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Patrick DaughertyFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEROME M. SCHWARTZDickinson Wright | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Patrick DaughertyFoley & Lardner | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.49 |