ICOA INC
CIK 745084Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- David GonzalezFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & MittmanFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| David Gonzalez | May 2004 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & Mittman | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 33 | 1.17 | 2.89 | 1.54 |